What Kind of Virtue Ethicist Is Hume?

In The Virtue Ethics of Hume and Nietzsche. Malden, MA: Wiley. pp. 87–108 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter argues that Hume's views on the nature and sources of virtue are pluralistic. He has a pluralistic account of the sources of the moral sentiment, the taxonomy of virtue, and most importantly, the criteria of virtue. The chapter also argues that his views are neither utilitarian in particular nor consequentialist in general, but comprise overlooked but significant non‐consequentialist features, gleaned particularly from Book II of the Treatise (Of the Passions), and which are characteristic of virtue ethics in general. It is devoted to investigating the status of (C2) as an independent criterion of virtue. The chapter discusses three broad categories of “species” or “appearance” which make a trait “naturally fitted” to be regarded as a virtue. Discussions also include indirect passion of pride. The connection between love of truth and hope for success brings us to the virtue cluster associated with the direct passion of hope.

Other Versions

original Swanton, Christine (2010) "What kind of virtue theorist is Hume?". In Pigden, Charles, Hume on Is and Ought, pp. : Palgrave-Macmillan (2010)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
13 (#1,326,944)

6 months
4 (#1,258,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Virtuous actions in the Mengzi.Waldemar Brys - 2023 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 31 (1):2-22.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references