A Relevant Invalidity In Curry's Foundations

Bulletin of the Section of Logic 16 (1):51-53 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Curry claims that the positive paradox principle, ` A ⊃ in his elementary statement presentation, ‘is valid in any normal interpretation’ . By previous definition, ‘an interpretation of a system S is a normal interpretation just when the proposition A is true when and only when ` A’ . But his argument to normal validity is interestingly, and relevantly, invalid

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,203

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A relevant validity in Curry's foundations: A reply to Richard Sylvan.J. P. Seldin - 1987 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 16 (2):68-70.
Two Flavors of Curry’s Paradox.Jc Beall & Julien Murzi - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy 110 (3):143-165.
Expressing Validity: Towards a Self-Sufficient Inferentialism.Ulf Hlobil - 2020 - In Martin Blicha & Igor Sedlar (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2019. College Publications. pp. 67-82.
Curry’s Paradox, Generalized Contraction Rule and Depth Relevance.Francisco Salto, Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez - 2018 - In Konstantinos Boudouris (ed.), Proceedings XXIII world Congress Philosophy. Charlottesville: Philosophy Documentation Center. pp. 35-39.
Logically Impossible Worlds.Koji Tanaka - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Logic 15 (2):489.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references