Why not be pluralists about explanatory reduction?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Against the unification of the behavioral sciences.Steve Clarke - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):21-22.
Why optimality is not worth arguing about.Stephen E. G. Lea - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (2):225-225.
Why argue about direct perception?J. J. Koenderink - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):390-391.
Deception and explanatory economy.Arthur C. Danto - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (2):252-253.
Defending explanatory coherence.Paul Thagard - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):745-748.
Epiphenomenalism and the reduction of experience.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):680-680.
Extending explanatory coherence.Paul Thagard - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):490-502.
Augmentation/reduction update.Monte S. Buchsbaum - 1986 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (4):748-749.
On the utility of stress as an explanatory concept.David Lester - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):112-113.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-08

Downloads
54 (#395,162)

6 months
9 (#454,186)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kathryn Tabb
Bard College