- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Is the Mother’s Decision to Opt for Artificial Womb Technology Always “Supererogatory”?
American Journal of Bioethics 23 (5):119-121 (2023)
Abstract
In their comprehensive review article, De Bie et al., using some references, discreetly point out that pregnant women’s decision in Domain III to undergo fetal extraction via C-section should conti...Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Lost in Gestation: On Fetonates, Perinates, and Gestatelings.Lien De Proost & Geertjan Zuijdwegt - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (5):108-110.
No Substitute: The False Promise of Artificial Womb Technology as an Alternative to Abortion.Benjamin Patterson Brown & Katie Watson - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (5):87-89.
Artificial Womb Technology, Catholic Health Care, and Social Justice.John Holmes & Laura Hosford - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (5):123-125.
Expanding the Frame: An Afrofuturist Response to Artificial Womb Technology.Leah Lomotey-Nakon & Elizabeth Lanphier - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (5):99-101.
Artificial Womb Technology and the Restructuring of Gestational Boundaries.Richard B. Gibson & Lisa Campo-Engelstein - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (5):106-108.
Capabilities and Stakeholders – Two Ways of Enriching the Ethical Debate on Artificial Womb Technology.André Krom, Angret de Boer, Rosa Geurtzen & Martine C. de Vries - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (5):110-113.
Feminist Concerns About Artificial Womb Technology.Tamara Kayali Browne, Evie Kendal & Tiia Sudenkaarne - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (5):97-99.
Beyond a Medicalized View of Reproduction: Recentering Pregnant People in the Ethics of Ectogenesis.Nina Roesner - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (5):102-104.
Toward a Broader Conception of Equity in Artificial Womb Technology.Laura L. Kimberly & Gwendolyn P. Quinn - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (5):114-116.
Artificial Wombs or Artificial Feminism: What Is Wrong With Being Pregnant?Tessa Gavina, Chris Gastmans & Alice Cavolo - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (5):104-106.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-05-05
Downloads
28 (#837,946)
6 months
10 (#281,857)
2023-05-05
Downloads
28 (#837,946)
6 months
10 (#281,857)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Ethics Considerations Regarding Artificial Womb Technology for the Fetonate.Felix R. De Bie, Sarah D. Kim, Sourav K. Bose, Pamela Nathanson, Emily A. Partridge, Alan W. Flake & Chris Feudtner - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (5):67-78.
Rethinking Abortion, Ectogenesis, and Fetal Death.Christine Overall - 2015 - Journal of Social Philosophy 46 (1):126-140.
Supererogation.Douglas W. Portmore - 2013 - In J. E. Crimmins & D. C. Long, Encyclopedia of Utilitarianism. Bloomsbury Academic.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-kjfxj dc2