Epistemic Vigilance and the Science/Religion Distinction

Journal of Cognition and Culture 20 (1-2):88-99 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Both science and religion are human endeavours that recruit and modify pre-existing human capacity to engage in epistemic vigilance. However, while science relies upon a focus on content vigilance, religion focusses on source vigilance. This difference is due, in turn, to the function of religious claims not being connected to their accuracy – unlike the function of scientific claims. Understanding this difference helps to understand many aspects of scientific and religious institutions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pragmatics and Epistemic Vigilance.Diana Mazzarella - 2015 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15 (2):183-199.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-15

Downloads
32 (#711,554)

6 months
8 (#603,286)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Konrad Talmont-Kaminski
University of Bialystok

Citations of this work

Science as a moral system.Stefaan Blancke - 2022 - Synthese 200 (6):1-18.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Enigma of Reason.Dan Sperber & Hugo Mercier (eds.) - 2017 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
Nonoverlapping magisteria.Stephen Jay Gould - 1997 - Natural History 106 (2):16--22.

View all 8 references / Add more references