Two Forms of the Straw Man

Argumentation 20 (3):345-352 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The authors identify and offer an analysis of a new form of the Straw Man fallacy, and then explore the implications of the prevalence of this fallacy for contemporary political discourse

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Straw Man Arguments.Scott F. Aikin & John Casey - 2022 - London, UK: Bloomsbury. Edited by John Casey.
Straw Men, Weak Men, and Hollow Men.Scott F. Aikin & John Casey - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):87-105.
The straw man fallacy.Douglas Walton - 1996 - In Johan van Benthem, Logic and argumentation. New York: North-Holland. pp. 115--128.
Straw Man.Scott Aikin & John Casey - 2018-05-09 - In Robert Arp, Steven Barbone & Michael Bruce, Bad Arguments. Wiley. pp. 223–226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
135 (#169,291)

6 months
7 (#519,682)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Robert B. Talisse
Vanderbilt University
Scott Aikin
Vanderbilt University

References found in this work

A practical study of argument.Trudy Govier - 1991 - Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Pub. Co..
On Liberty and Other Essays.John Stuart Mill (ed.) - 1991 - Oxford University Press.
A concise introduction to logic.Patrick J. Hurley - 2000 - Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Edited by Lori Watson.
The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964).Philip E. Converse - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (1-3):1-74.

View all 17 references / Add more references