Further Animal Liberation

Philosophy Now 142:35-39 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Building on the work of Jeremy Bentham and Peter Singer, Dr. John Tamilio III explores the normative moral bases for animal rights. Singer claims it is based on the fact that animals can feel pain. Tamilio concurs, adding that animals experience fear and possess some level of reasoning. He then offers a novel thought experiment as to why humans would advocate for their rights if aliens with a much-higher IQ sought to subjugate and exploit us.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bentham on animal welfare.Johannes Kniess - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (3):556-572.
Do Animals Feel Pain?Peter Harrison - 1991 - Philosophy 66 (255):25-40.
Animal rights: a philosophical defence.Mark Rowlands (ed.) - 1998 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
Is Peter Singer inconsistent in his ethics?Prabhu Venkataraman & Tanuja Kalita - 2014 - Cadernos Do Pet Filosofia 5 (10):45-52.
A Pessoa Vive no Ser Humano.Joana Pereira Marques - 2010 - Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (35):121-142.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-18

Downloads
14 (#1,276,532)

6 months
5 (#1,039,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references