- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The family-facilitated approach could be dangerous if there is pressure by family dynamics
American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):16 – 18 (2006)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Family covenants and confidentiality within families.Dianne M. Bartels - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):15 – 16.
The challenge of genetic testing as a family affair.Robert J. Moss - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):1 – 2.
Practical problems with family covenants in genetic testing.David B. Resnik - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):1 – 2.
The role of family liaisons in research ethics consultations.Halle Showalter Salas, Zuraya Aziz & Douglas S. Diekema - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):27 – 28.
The family covenant: A flawed response to the dilemmas of genetic testing.Gregory Stock - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):17 – 18.
Non-family directed donation: The perils of policy-making.Bethany J. Spielman - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (4):24 – 26.
Family Medicine, The Physician–Patient Relationship, and Patient-Centered Care.Howard Brody - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):38 – 39.
Obesity, Pressure Ulcers, and Family Enablers.Jeffrey P. Spike - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (7):81-82.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
36 (#625,374)
6 months
12 (#290,681)
2009-01-28
Downloads
36 (#625,374)
6 months
12 (#290,681)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Acquiescence is Not Agreement: The Problem of Marginalization in Pediatric Decision Making.Amy E. Caruso Brown - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (6):4-16.
Discussions on Present Japanese Psychocultural-Social Tendencies as Obstacles to Clinical Shared Decision-Making in Japan.Seiji Bito, Taketoshi Okita & Atsushi Asai - 2022 - Asian Bioethics Review 14 (2):133-150.
Relational Autonomy, the Right to Reject Treatment, and Advance Directives in Japan.Anri Asagumo - 2021 - Asian Bioethics Review 14 (1):57-69.
Contemporary issues concerning informed consent in Japan based on a review of court decisions and characteristics of Japanese culture.Sakiko Masaki, Hiroko Ishimoto & Atsushi Asai - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):8.
Perceptions of Psychosocial and Ethical Issues and the Psychological Characteristics of Donors in the Clinical Setting of Living Kidney Donors: A Qualitative Study.Nana Arai, Naoki Yokoyama, Mayumi Hara & Yoshiyuki Takimoto - 2024 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 15 (1):22-32.
References found in this work
Informed consent revisited: Japan and the U.s.Akira Akabayashi & Brian Taylor Slingsby - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):9 – 14.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-2pm92 dc2