Species as a relationship

Acta Analytica 23 (4):337-347 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The fact that humans have a special relationship to each other insofar as they belong in the same species is often taken to be a morally relevant difference between humans and other animals, one which justifies a greater moral status for all humans, regardless of their individual capacities. I give some reasons why this kind of relationship is not an appropriate ground for differential treatment of humans and nonhumans. I then argue that even if relationships do matter morally species membership cannot justify a difference in moral status. This has important implications because it removes one barrier to giving animals greater moral status.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Argument from Marginal Cases: is species a relevant difference.Julia Tanner - 2011 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):225-235.
What, if anything, renders all humans morally equal?Richard J. Arneson - 1999 - In Dale Jamieson (ed.), Singer and His Critics. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 103-28.
Speciesism and moral status.Peter Singer - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (3-4):567-581.
Betraying Animals.Steve Cooke - 2019 - The Journal of Ethics 23 (2):183-200.
Evolving Notions of Nonhuman Personhood: Is Moral Standing Sufficient?Dorothy Riddle - 2014 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 24 (3):4-19.
Is there a morally relevant difference between human and animal nonpersons?Evelyn Pluhar - 1988 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 1 (1):59-68.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
139 (#160,158)

6 months
10 (#399,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?