Five. Do animals and plants have rights?

In Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. pp. 219-255 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.23943/9781400838530-007

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Making a Dent in Speciesism. A Review of Paul W. Taylor, "Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics". [REVIEW]T. M. Caro - 1989 - Biology and Philosophy 4 (3):353.
With Respect for Nature: Living as Part of the Natural World.J. Claude Evans (ed.) - 2005 - State University of New York Press.
Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics.Paul W. Taylor (ed.) - 1986
Paul W. Taylor, "Respect for Nature".Michael Allen Fox - 1988 - Critical Philosophy 4:232.
Justifying a respect for nature.Gene Spitler - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (3):255-260.
Paul Warren Taylor.Mylan Engel Jr - 2008 - In Engel Jr Mylan (ed.), Encyclopedia of Environmental Ethics and Philosophy, Vol. 2. Gale Cengage Learning. pp. 302-304.
Dylematy i paradoksy etycznego ekstensjonalizmu.Janusz A. Majcherek - 2015 - Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 5 (1):191-210.
Animal rights: Autonomy and redundancy. [REVIEW]David Sztybel - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (3):259-273.
The Five Freedoms of Animal Welfare are Rights.Clare McCausland - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (4):649-662.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-05

Downloads
23 (#943,106)

6 months
7 (#715,360)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references