- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Instead of revising half the story, why not rewrite the whole thing?
American Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):19 – 21 (2007)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Why an online graduate bioethics program: One student's experience.Patrick J. McCruden - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (4):25 – 26.
Why retreat to procedural justice?Mary B. Mahowald - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):25 – 26.
Why researchers cannot establish equipoise.Robert M. Veatch - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):55 – 57.
Why Deidentification Fails Research Subjects and Researchers.Robert Gellman - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):28-30.
Prcis of “why think?” Evolution and the rational mind.Ronald de Sousa - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (5):4 – 9.
Why public health and politics don't mix.Jeffrey P. Kahn - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (11):3 – 4.
Why should we be concerned about disparate impact?Ronald A. Lindsay - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (5):23 – 24.
Chance or choice - why not pick our children's gender?Gregory Stock - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (1):33 – 34.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
25 (#877,287)
6 months
5 (#1,035,700)
2009-01-28
Downloads
25 (#877,287)
6 months
5 (#1,035,700)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Advancing neuroregenerative medicine: A call for expanded collaboration between scientists and ethicists.Jocelyn Grunwell, Judy Illes & Katrina Karkazis - 2008 - Neuroethics 2 (1):13-20.
References found in this work
Defining and Describing Benefit Appropriately in Clinical Trials.Nancy M. P. King - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4):332-343.
Determining Risk in Pediatric Research with No Prospect of Direct Benefit: Time for a National Consensus on the Interpretation of Federal Regulations.Celia B. Fisher - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):5-10.
Canaries in the mines: children, risk, non-therapeutic research, and justice.M. Spriggs - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2):176-181.
Were Tuskegee & Willowbrook 'Studies in Nature'?David J. Rothman - 1982 - Hastings Center Report 12 (2):5-7.
Assessing Benefits in Clinical Research: Why Diversity in Benefit Assessment Can Be Risky.Larry R. Churchill, Daniel K. Nelson, Gail E. Henderson, Nancy M. P. King, Arlene M. Davis, Erin Leahey & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2003 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 25 (3):1.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2