The normative function of metaethics

Philosophical Review 67 (1):16-32 (1958)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2182767

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On the Relevance of Metaethics: New Essays on Metaethics.Mark Timmons, Jocelyne Couture & Kai Nielsen - 1998 - Philosophical Review 107 (3):452.
A reply to mr. Taylor.Frederick A. Olafson - 1959 - Philosophical Review 68 (3):373-379.
Hobbes: The Taylor thesis.Stuart M. Brown - 1959 - Philosophical Review 68 (3):303-323.
The Philosophical Lectures of Samuel Taylor Coleridge.Philip Blair Rice - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):101.
Fatalism and professor Taylor.Bruce Aune - 1962 - Philosophical Review 71 (4):512-519.
Review of Gosling and Taylor, The Greeks on Pleasure. [REVIEW]Richard Kraut - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (2):265-270.
Moral problems, moral philosophy, and metaethics: Some further dogmas of empiricism.Warner A. Wick - 1953 - Philosophical Review 62 (1):3-22.
Normative Discourse.Avrum Stroll - 1963 - Philosophical Review 72 (2):255.
The Mysticism of Paul the Apostle. [REVIEW]Albert E. Avey - 1934 - Philosophical Review 43 (1):84-86.
The Theology of Paul Tillich. [REVIEW]Paul Ramsey - 1954 - Philosophical Review 63 (3):453-457.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
203 (#124,195)

6 months
11 (#370,490)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Are metaethical theories normatively neutral?William T. Blackstone - 1961 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 39 (1):65 – 74.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references