Belief, Existence, and Meaning [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 24 (4):749-750 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book is an attempt to give a completely extensional account of belief without recourse to entities such as propositions and the like. This is done by developing a semantical metalanguage and instead of alluding to such intensional elements as meanings, the talk is rather of individuals, virtual classes, and relations. A Quinean kind of paraphrastic program is used, making explicit time references and belief conditions, as well as the above objects of belief. They are all keyed to the user of a specific language through Martin's use of testing and acceptance as primitive notions, giving the entire project a behavioristic flavor. These particular primitives have been chosen in view of the supposition that they have clear experimental meanings and that they are crucial to the logical analysis of experimental method. The upshot of Martin's approach is an analysis of belief in terms of their relational characteristics. Hence, on his view, we cannot properly speak of knowledge and belief, but only of knowing and believing. In the course of developing his logic of belief, Martin manages to touch upon a wide range of topics. Quine's notion of ontic commitment is expanded to include "ontic involvement"--a second order commitment involving the objects of Martin's metalanguage. Arguments are offered against the contemporary view that there are a multiplicity of logics: "One God, one country, one logic" being the professed underlying maxim of his book. There is a longish discussion marking out a distinction between facts and events, modeled after his account of belief. A brief chapter reassesses and defends Frege's notion of Sinn in terms of Martin's logical machinery. Interspersed throughout are commentaries on a number of figures, such as Russell and Carnap, Hintikka and von Wright. Included also is a chapter on human action based on a distinction between action types and action events. There, Davidson's analysis of action sentences is criticized in terms of the 'Fido'-Fido principle. The extensive use of symbols seems cumbersome, but is perhaps necessary given the nature of Martin's enterprise.--K. T.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,270

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Belief, existence, and meaning.Richard Milton Martin - 1969 - New York,: New York University Press.
Belief, Existence, and Meaning.John Bacon - 1972 - International Philosophical Quarterly 12 (2):279-293.
Belief, Existence, and Meaning.Richard M. Martin - 1969 - Foundations of Language 12 (2):301-305.
ARTIN, R. M.: Belief, Existence, and Meaning. [REVIEW]J. J. C. Smart - 1970 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48:400.
R. M. Martin’s Logic of Belief.David Parsons - 2017 - History and Philosophy of Logic 38 (1):72-86.
Occurrent Belief.Michael John Bello - 1980 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago
Beliefs and Their Objects.Curtis Allan Brown - 1982 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Belief versus acceptance.Raimo Tuomela - 2000 - Philosophical Explorations 3 (2):122 – 137.
Classical Realism and the Integration of Knowledge.Francis H. Parker - 1961 - Review of Metaphysics 14 (3):543 - 564.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
19 (#1,081,553)

6 months
2 (#1,689,990)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references