The Crisis of Democracy and the Problem of Democratic Peace

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 65 (3):39-57 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author analyzes three waves of the crisis of democracy during the 20th and early 21st centuries. The first crisis of democracy in the early 20th century is caused by the emergence and development of public politics, which challenged the possibility to govern the masses having conflict potential, it balanced the power of the people and universal suffrage with the control of the media in order to maintain the stability of political system. The second wave of the crisis of democracy (the last third of the 20th century) is associated with the destruction of the conventional world and the weakening of the nation-state; and its markers were: the imbalance between the branches of government, the domination of economics over politics, the predominance of equality over freedom, the problematic implementation of human rights, and, as a consequence, the inability to put into practice the national form of democracy. The third wave of crisis (early the 21st century) is accompanied by the transformation of democracy into post-democracy, in which the power of the people is replaced by the power of global capital, and the illusion of consent is reinforced by the prohibition of alternative points of view and the narrowing of the space of issues allowed for discussion in the name of public security. The crisis of the policy to achieve peace through the transformation of the balance of powers into a balance of interests called into question the principles of democracy. On the contrary, post-democracies justify the use of force to spread democracy around the world, and they take an active part in contemporary military conflicts, which can rightly be defined as hybrid proxy wars. Drawing on J. Habermas’s concept of communicative rationality, the author concludes that to overcome the crisis of democracy it is necessary to accept the very possibility of an alternative to this form of government and allow to discuss these previously marginalized issues as well as to maintain the return of the majority to genuine communication and politics, contribute to its enlightenment.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Democracy: From One Crisis to Another.Marcel Gauchet & Natalie J. Doyle - 2015 - Social Imaginaries 1 (1):163-187.
The media and the crisis of democracy: rethinking aesthetic politics.Jaeho Kang - 2010 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 57 (124):1-22.
The Media and the Crisis of Democracy: Rethinking Aesthetic Politics.Jaeho Kang - 2010 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 57 (125):1-22.
Repressed Democracy: Legitimacy Problems in World Society.Regina Kreide - 2012 - Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía Política 1 (1).
The Crisis of Capitalist Democracy.Adrian Pabst - 2010 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2010 (152):44-67.
Postdemokratie als Krisendiagnose.Daniel Kersting - 2023 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 71 (3):428-449.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-06

Downloads
22 (#972,197)

6 months
8 (#583,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant, liberal legacies, and foreign affairs.Michael W. Doyle - 1983 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (3):205-235.
Post-Democracy.[author unknown] - 2004

Add more references