Inferentialism, logicism, harmony, and a counterpoint

Abstract

Inferentialism is explained as an attempt to provide an account of meaning that is more sensitive (than the tradition of truth-conditional theorizing deriving from Tarski and Davidson) to what is learned when one masters meanings.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Inferentialism without Verificationism: Reply to Prawitz.Julien Murzi - 2011 - In Emiliano Ippoliti, Carlo Cellucci & Emily Grosholz (eds.), Logic and Knowledge. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholar Publishing. pp. 285-90.
Harmonic inferentialism and the logic of identity.Stephen Read - 2016 - Review of Symbolic Logic 9 (2):408-420.
From Epistemic Expressivism to Epistemic Inferentialism.Matthew Chrisman - 2008 - In Duncan Pritchard, Alan Millar & Adrian Haddock (eds.), Social Epistemology. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Communication Without Shared Meanings.Matej Drobňák - forthcoming - Acta Analytica:1-18.
General-Elimination Harmony and the Meaning of the Logical Constants.Stephen Read - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (5):557-576.
Identity of Dynamic Meanings.Pavel Arazim - 2022 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 22 (64):69-90.
The History and Prehistory of Natural-Language Semantics.Daniel W. Harris - 2017 - In Sandra Lapointe & Christopher Pincock (eds.), Innovations in the History of Analytical Philosophy. London, United Kingdom: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 149--194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
114 (#188,603)

6 months
15 (#208,967)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Neil Tennant
Ohio State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references