On self-governance over time

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64 (9):901-912 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT In Planning, Time, and Self-Governanace, Bratman argues that the notion of self-governance plays an important role in grounding the rational principles such as means-ends coherence in the synchronic case, and principles of stability and coherence through time in the case of self-governance over time. In this paper, I grant Bratman’s claim for the synchronic case, however I argue that it is not clear that one can extend the reasoning to the diachronic case. More specifically, I raise a number of doubts about whether any notion of diachronic self-governance can play the role in the theory of practical rationality that Bratman assigns to it.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,314

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-10

Downloads
100 (#217,687)

6 months
9 (#328,796)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sergio Tenenbaum
University of Toronto, Mississauga

Citations of this work

How Temptation Works.John Schwenkler - 2024 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 27 (3).
Planning, time, and self-governance: replies to Andreou, Tenenbaum, and Velleman.Michael E. Bratman - 2021 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64 (9):926-936.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why be rational.Niko Kolodny - 2005 - Mind 114 (455):509-563.

Add more references