Semantic realism, rigid designation, and dynamic semantics

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):85-86 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Semantic realism fits Millikan's account of kind terms in its focus on information-theoretic abilities and strategic ways of gathering information in human communication. Instead of the traditional logical necessity, we should interpret rigid designation in a dynamic semantics as a legislative act to constrain possible ways in which our belief may change

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rigid designation and semantic structure.Arthur Sullivan - 2007 - Philosophers' Imprint 7:1-22.
Rigid designation, direct reference, and modal metaphysics.Arthur Sullivan - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):577–599.
Rigid Designation and Natural Kind Terms, Pittsburgh Style.Michael P. Wolf - 2012 - Normative Functionalism and the Pittsburgh School.
Metaphor muddles in communication theory.Drew Rendall & Paul Vasey - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):637-637.
Rigid Designation and Anaphoric Theories of Reference.Michael P. Wolf - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 130 (2):351-375.
Two types of rigid designation.Iris Einheuser - 2005 - Dialectica 59 (3):367–374.
Rigid designation and semantic value.Colin Mcginn - 1982 - Philosophical Quarterly 32 (127):97-115.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
65 (#325,365)

6 months
15 (#205,076)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references