The Limits of Proxy Decision Making: Overtreatment

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (4):524 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

With the passage by virtually every state legislature of healthcare proxy laws, the medical profession increasingly can expect to rely on the participation of surrogates in making decisions on behalf of incompetent patients. Several concerns about the legitimacy of proxy decision making have been discussed in the ethical and general medical literature: the lack of concordance between the views of patients and their surrogates have been documented on multiple occasions, and cases of abuse by proxies or potential conflict of interest have been reported. Another dilemma that deserves discussion arises when proxies demand withdrawal of treatment that physicians and nurses regard as essential to the wellbeing of the patient. The following case highlights this dilemma

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Limits of Proxy Decision Making: Undertreatment.Muriel R. Gillick & Terri Fried - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (2):172.
Conflict in the Pediatric Setting: Clinical Judgment vs. Parental Autonomy.Amnon Goldworth - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (1):36.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
61 (#348,948)

6 months
20 (#145,906)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?