The Standard of Correctness and the Ontology of Depiction

American Philosophical Quarterly 58 (4):399-412 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper develops Richard Wollheim’s claim that the proper appreciation of a picture involves not only enjoying a seeing-in experience but also abiding by a standard of correctness. While scholars have so far focused on what fixes the standard, thereby discussing the alternative between intentions and causal mechanisms, the paper focuses on what the standard does, that is, establishing which kinds, individuals, features and standpoints are relevant to the understanding of pictures. It is argued that, while standards concerning kinds, individuals and features can be relevant also to ordinary perception, standards concerning standpoints are specific to pictorial experience. Drawing on all this, the paper proposes an ontology of depiction according to which a picture is constituted by both its visual appearance and its standard of correctness.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Pictorial implicature.Catharine Abell - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (1):55–66.
Belief and correctness.Davide Fassio - 2012 - Dissertation,
Belief, Correctness and Constitutivity.Davide Fassio - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):1084-1106.
Belief, Correctness and normativity.Davide Fassio - 2011 - Logique Et Analyse 54 (216):471.
In Defense of Constitutivism About Epistemic Normativity.David Horst - 2022 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 103 (2):232-258.
Pictures, presence and visibility.Solveig Aasen - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (1):187-203.
Twofold Pictorial Experience.René Jagnow - 2019 - Erkenntnis 86 (4):853-874.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-04

Downloads
710 (#35,614)

6 months
134 (#37,498)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Enrico Terrone
Università degli Studi di Genova

Citations of this work

Depiction.John Hyman & Katerina Bantinaki - 2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Caricature, recognition, misrepresentation.Federico Fantelli - forthcoming - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Two concepts of rules.John Rawls - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (1):3-32.
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.John Searle - 1969 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 4 (1):59-61.
Languages of Art.Nelson Goodman - 1970 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 3 (1):62-63.

View all 30 references / Add more references