Creolizing Modern Buddhism: A Reply to Yarran Hominh & A. Minh Nguyen

Comparative Philosophy 13 (1) (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In reply to Hominh and Nguyen, I argue that “creolizing” methods in the study and practice of Buddhism should not be opposed to historicist and contextualist modes of investigation and understanding. Rather, historicism and contextualism can and should inform creolizing approaches.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Creolizing Hegel.Michael J. Monahan (ed.) - 2017 - Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield International.
A Forum on Creolizing Social and Political Theory.Lewis R. Gordon - 2021 - Philosophy and Global Affairs 1 (2):267-275.
Creolizing Hannah Arendt.Marilyn Nissim-Sabat & Neil Roberts (eds.) - 2024 - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Creolizing Rousseau.Jane Anna Gordon & Neil Roberts (eds.) - 2014 - New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Creolizing Sartre.Kris Sealey & Storm Heter (eds.) - 2023 - Rowman & Littlefield.
Creolizing Development in Postcolonial Africa.T. D. Harper-Shipman - 2021 - Philosophy and Global Affairs 1 (2):351-359.
Creolizing the Nation.Jane Anna Gordon - 2022 - Critical Philosophy of Race 10 (1):128-136.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-07

Downloads
27 (#827,827)

6 months
2 (#1,687,048)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Evan Thompson
University of British Columbia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations