Ironic criticisms and responses on Chinese social media

Pragmatics and Cognition 31 (1):97-124 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ironic criticisms in online interactions are very common, but have rarely been examined. Following the concept of (non)propositional irony, this study investigates how online ironic criticisms are produced and responded to. The findings were derived from a mixed-methods analysis of 200 comments and 1,140 responses collected from Weibo. The analysis offers a computer-mediated taxonomy and identifies four subtypes of ironic criticisms, with different realisation forms in each subtype. Responses to negative evaluations are more common in online ironic interactions. Possible motivations for the prevalence of online ironic criticisms are also discussed. The findings shed light on the creativity of ironic criticisms on social media, and suggest the need for an updated definition of ironic criticisms to account for their use in online interactions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-10-12

Downloads
5 (#1,748,527)

6 months
5 (#1,032,319)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Irony is critical.Joana Garmendia - 2010 - Pragmatics and Cognition 18 (2):397-421.
40 Years of Research Into Children’s Irony Comprehension.Julia Fuchs - 2023 - Pragmatics and Cognition 30 (1):1-30.
The transgressive rhetoric of standup comedy in China.Gengsong Gao & Dan Chen - 2023 - Critical Discourse Studies 20 (1):1-17.
When language bites.Sabina Tabacaru - 2017 - Pragmatics and Cognition 24 (2):186-211.

View all 8 references / Add more references