Should the People Decided?' Referendums in a Post-Sovereign Age, the Scottish and Catalonian Cases

Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 45 (2):99-118 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article uses the rise of referendum democracy to highlight the tenacity of modern nationalism in Western Europe. The proliferation of direct democracy around the world raises important questions about the health of representative democracy. The paper offers a theoretical re-evaluation of the role of the referendum, using the 2014 referendum on Scottish independence to challenge some of the traditional democratic criticisms of popular democracy. The final part of the paper addresses the specific application of referendums in the context of sub-state nationalism, addressing what might be called `the demos question'. This question was addressed by the Supreme Court in Canada in the Quebec Secession Reference but has also been brought to the fore by the Scottish reference and the unresolved issue of self-determination in Catalonia.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is the Referendum Really Against Legalism?Przemyslaw Krzywoszynski - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 69:229-234.
Role of referenda in the exercise of power.Валентина Давидівна Воднік - 2020 - Вісник Нюу Імені Ярослава Мудрого: Серія: Філософія, Філософія Права, Політологія, Соціологія 2 (45):154-166.
Flip-Flopping in a Representative Democracy.Jorn Sonderholm - 2019 - Public Affairs Quarterly 33 (1):21-40.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-28

Downloads
17 (#1,152,721)

6 months
7 (#711,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references