But is it art?: the value of art and the temptation of theory

New York: Blackwell (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,634

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

But Is It Art? The Value of Art and the Temptation of Theory.Catherine Lord - 1986 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 45 (2):203-205.
But Is It Art? The Value of Art and the Temptation of Theory.Gary Iseminger - 1986 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 20 (3):115.
Culture and art: an anthology.Lars Aagaard-Mogensen (ed.) - 1976 - Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
Collingwood: A Philosophy of Art by Aaron. R. G. Ridley.John Dilworth - 1999 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (3):390-392.
TILGHMAN, B. R.: "But is it Art"?G. Currie - 1986 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64:231.
Artworks Are Not Valuable for Their Own Sake.Nicholas F. Stang - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (3):271-280.
Beardsley's legacy: The theory of aesthetic value.Alan Goldman - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (2):185–189.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
105 (#211,101)

6 months
11 (#299,272)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The definition of art.Thomas Adajian - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references