Behavior Analysis, Common Sense, and Logic: Reply to Barnes-Holmes

Behavior and Philosophy 33:81 - 84 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Barnes-Holmes characterizes his views as a-ontological, not antirealist. My criticisms still apply. Barnes-Holmes has not given any good reason to accept antirealism, nor has he given any good reason to accept an a-ontological position. Because his views, a-ontological or otherwise, are contradicted by ubiquitous aspects of the theory and practice of behavior analysis, these views should be rejected until supported by new and better arguments.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
31 (#727,171)

6 months
5 (#1,038,502)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Brains in a Vat.Hilary Putnam - 2000 - In Sven Bernecker & Fred I. Dretske (eds.), Knowledge: readings in contemporary epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-21.
Verbal Behavior.Burrhus Frederic Skinner - 1957 - Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Add more references