Defining `disease'--classification must be distinguished from evaluation

Journal of Medical Ethics 7 (4):197-201 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The use of the term `disease' in medicine is discussed, with particular reference to the issues raised by Kennedy (I) and the definition proposed by Campbell, Scadding and Roberts (2). Certain difficulties arising from this definition are considered, and a revised set of definitions is suggested, based on a distinction between diseasedness, contrasted both with health and with other sorts of problems, and nosological categories used to distinguish conditions calling for different treatments. The difference is stressed between those aspects of medical decision-making which call for judgment on scientific grounds and those of the sort referred to by Kennedy, which involve ethical and political judgments

Other Versions

edition Toon, P. D. (1981) "Defining 'disease': Classification must be distinguished from evaluation". Journal of Medical Ethics: The Journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics 7():197-201

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
30 (#748,172)

6 months
9 (#477,108)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Where the ethical action is.Doug Hardman & Phil Hutchinson - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (1):45–48.
The concept of disease—vague, complex, or just indefinable?Bjørn Hofmann - 2010 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13 (1):3-10.
Baby Fae: a beastly business.T. Kushner & R. Belliotti - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (4):178-183.
Medical ethics: a brief response to Seedhouse.P. D. Toon - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (1):47-48.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references