The parallel fallacy: On comparing art and science

British Journal of Aesthetics 30 (4):311-317 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

"A Theory of Art": Stephen David Ross. [REVIEW]Harold Osborne - 1982 - British Journal of Aesthetics 22 (3):272.
"Winckelmann, Writings on Art": David Irwin. [REVIEW]Richard Woodfield - 1973 - British Journal of Aesthetics 13 (1):86.
Islamic Art" David Talbot Rice. [REVIEW]Sabrina Mitchell - 1965 - British Journal of Aesthetics 5 (4):410.
"Changing Art, Changing Man": David Mandel. [REVIEW]Sonia Greger - 1969 - British Journal of Aesthetics 9 (4):418.
"Art and the Religious Experience": F. David Martin. [REVIEW]Hugo Meynell - 1974 - British Journal of Aesthetics 14 (2):181.
"English Neo-Classical Art": David Irwin. [REVIEW]Michael Eastham - 1967 - British Journal of Aesthetics 7 (3):297.
Modern Art and Modern Science: The Parallel Analysis of Vision.Paul C. Vitz & Arnold B. Glimcher - 1985 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 43 (3):330-331.
Aesthetics in science and in art.Gideon Engler - 1990 - British Journal of Aesthetics 30 (1):24-34.
The factualist fallacy in aesthetics.Melvin Rader - 1970 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 28 (4):435-439.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
27 (#824,377)

6 months
8 (#580,966)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references