Eidetic analysis, informal rigor, and a phenomenological critique of Carnap's notion of explication

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 33 (1):48-61 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rudolf Carnap's analysis of `truth'.Felix Kaufmann - 1948 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (2):294-299.
Rudolf Carnap's analysis of `truth': Reply.Rudolf Carnap - 1948 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (2):300-304.
Is eidetic intuition necessary?Louis O. Kattsoff - 1949 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 10 (4):563-571.
A Kantian critique of scientific essentialism, Robert Hanna.Evaluational IUusions - 1998 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (3).
Induction and Husserl's theory of eidetic variation.David Michael Levin - 1968 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 29 (1):1-15.
Professor Carnap's philosophy of probability.Donald C. Williams - 1952 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 13 (1):103-121.
Heidegger's critique of Hegel's notion of time.Jere Paul Surber - 1979 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (3):358-377.
Husserl's critique of Hume's notion of distinctions of reason.Robert E. Butts - 1959 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20 (2):213-221.
R. Carnap's Einfuhrung in die Symbolische Logik. [REVIEW]R. M. Martin - 1956 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 17:279.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
220 (#116,913)

6 months
7 (#715,360)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references