The easy difference: Sex in behavioural ecology

In Annabelle Dufourcq, Annemie Halsema, Katrine Smiet & Karen Vintges, Purple Brains: Feminisms at the Limits of Philosophy. Nijmegen: Radboud University Press. pp. 98-105 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter questions the way “sex” features in behavioral ecological research as a standard explanatory variable. Researchers often use sex to explain variation in a trait or phenomenon that they are studying. This practice is widespread, partly because sex is often easy to identify and often explains some variation, thus making it easier to discover and test other causal patterns of interest. Yet, sex also frequently fails to explain variation. Using a couple of recent examples, it is shown how the pervasiveness of sex as an explanatory variable is partly due to the structure of scientific research, including the use of data from large longitudinal studies, and generalization from previous studies. Researchers should more carefully assess and justify the relevance of sex to each new study, to avoid overgeneralization and the perpetuation of assumptions about sexual difference and its importance in biology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,526

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sex Contextualism.Sarah S. Richardson - 2022 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 14 (2).
Sex-Gender in Life-Science Research: Conceptual Renegotiations and an Enactivist Vision.A. Thinius - 2024 - In Annabelle Dufourcq, Annemie Halsema, Katrine Smiet & Karen Vintges, Purple Brains: Feminisms at the Limits of Philosophy. Nijmegen: Radboud University Press.
Teleology and Defining Sex.Nathan K. Gamble & Michal Pruski - 2018 - The New Bioethics 24 (2):176-189.
Sex Inequality and Bias in Sex Differences Research.Alison M. Jaggar - 1987 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (sup1):24-39.
Moderators of sex differences in sexual selection theory.Anthony D. Pellegrini - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):285 - 286.
Between-sex differences are often averaging artifacts.Hoben Thomas - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):265-265.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-07-16

Downloads
27 (#879,595)

6 months
11 (#272,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rose Trappes
University of Bergen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references