Will Gemini agree with openAI Deep Research, and with humans?

Working Paper Series with A.I (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I consult with Google’s Gemini concerning the content of the article [1] produced with the help of openAI Deep Research. Then the exercise continues with article [2], which is written by a human researcher. When a new ingredient [3] is added to the party, we can also see how Gemini evaluates its usefulness to the previous analyses. Then, I move on to checking new changes in Gemini’s opinions when a third review, also by a human [4], is introduced. Since all the questions are straightforward to understand, there is no need for me to make any substantial edits to Gemini’s.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

They diagnosed me a schizophrenic when I was just a Gemini. 'The other side of madness'.Colin King - 2006 - In Man Cheung Chung, Bill Fulford & George Graham, Reconceiving Schizophrenia. Oxford University Press.
Creative, Whimsical Stories that Require Deep Thinking.D. Copp - 2024 - Amazon Book Review Series of “Wild Wise Weird”.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-02-24

Downloads
89 (#249,000)

6 months
89 (#74,287)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thi Mai Anh Tran
Michigan Technological University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations