A Reply to a recent review

Byzantinische Zeitschrift 96 (2):802-804 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In replying to Dr. Wolfram Brandes' review of my History of the Byzantine State and Society and Concise History of Byzantium in BZ 95 (2002), pp. 716–25, I shall confine myself to correcting what I consider distortions of fact, and pass over my differences with the reviewer about theory, which cannot be usefully discussed until those distortions are corrected.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,154

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

W. TREADGOLD, A History of the Byzantine State and Society.Wolfram Brandes - 2002 - Byzantinische Zeitschrift 95 (2):716-725.
A reply to Tryon's: A reply to loker's'theory in psychology.A. Loker - 1999 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 20 (3):299-310.
Physical and social facts in anthropology.J. A. Barnes - 1964 - Philosophy of Science 31 (3):294-297.
Conspiracy Theories and Their Investigator(s).R. X. Dentith Matthew - 2017 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6 (4):4-11.
Merit, Responsibility, and Thucydides.A. W. H. Adkins - 1975 - Classical Quarterly 25 (02):209-.
Treadgold . A History of Byzantine State and Society. [REVIEW]Michel Kaplan - 2000 - Revue Belge de Philologie Et D’Histoire 78 (3-4):1058-1059.
Bioethics: Past, Present, and an Open Future.Erich H. Loewy - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (4):388-397.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
20 (#1,027,456)

6 months
10 (#381,237)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references