The Role of Mythology in the Cultural-Historical Paradigm of Development

Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 7 (2):107-114 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The work explores the role of mythology in the formation of cultural values, and paradigmatic coordinates as the most stable form of reproducing socio-cultural experience, namely as a mechanism for regulating human behavior, which is relevant for any type of culture. It is considered that the basis of the mythological form of organization of individual and group experience constitute from a sensory-reflexive, contemplative and productive way of understanding the world, and the mechanism of regulation of human behavior consists in the inseparability of the paradigmatic nature of behavior and the justification of its meaning and actions that go beyond the boundaries of individual, social experience in the form of higher meaningfulness, which is the specificity of myth.Attention is focused on a certain kind of interaction between myth and philosophy, where the myth, despite its irrational essence, has not been left out of the attention of philosophical thought. It is emphasized that mythology constantly experienced changes and adaptation to new living conditions, cultural factors and its paradigmatic foundations. But despite everything, from its critical understanding to its rehabilitation in postmodernism, the myth continues to play an important role in influencing human consciousness and shaping worldview. Being actually rehabilitated, the myth is considered as an important factor in the process of forming not only cultural symbols but also narratives. It complements rational knowledge, helps to understand archetypal and symbolic aspects of human reality, which are not always comprehended with the help of rational methods of cognition.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Schelling – from Logos to Myth.Iliana Ilieva - 2021 - Filosofiya-Philosophy 30 (4):349-358.
Дефініція міфу: У пошуках інклюзивного підходу.Oleksandr Siedin - 2019 - Наукові Записки Наукма. Філософія Та Релігієзнавство 4:58-66.
Geopolitical Image: Between Utopia and Myth.T. Lavruk - 2015 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1:108-114.
Negative Mythology.Shane Chalmers - 2020 - Law and Critique 31 (1):59-72.
Philosophical and cultural dimensions of the transcendental.L. Zelisko - 2013 - Ukrainian Religious Studies 67:21-27.
Understanding as the basis for social and communicative interaction.М. Ю Куц - 2016 - Вісник Нюу Імені Ярослава Мудрого: Серія: Філософія, Філософія Права, Політологія, Соціологія 1 (28):220-228.
Myth and mythology.V. Garin - 2002 - Ukrainian Religious Studies 22:16-23.
Ціннісні виміри соціокультурного буття людини.N. V. Hnasevych - 2018 - Гуманітарний Вісник Запорізької Державної Інженерної Академії 74:61-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-01-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Myth and mythology.V. Garin - 2002 - Ukrainian Religious Studies 22:16-23.

Add more references