Extracting Epistemic Lessons from Ameliorative Psychology

In Michael A. Bishop & J. D. Trout (eds.), Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment. New York: OUP USA (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter introduces the three central features of the epistemological framework that guides the prescriptions of Ameliorative Psychology. It is argued that this framework offers a new way to think about applied epistemology. In particular, it suggests that there are four and only four ways for people to improve their reasoning.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Should Analytic Epistemology Be Replaced By Ameliorative Psychology?Mark McEvoy - 2007 - Southwest Philosophy Review 23 (1):163-171.
Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment.Michael A. Bishop & J. D. Trout - 2004 - New York: OUP USA. Edited by J. D. Trout.
Book Reviews. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2006 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (2):233-242.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
15 (#1,233,030)

6 months
13 (#258,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

J. D. Trout
Loyola University, Chicago
Michael Bishop
University of Chicago

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references