Reality TV and the Entrapment of Predators

In Peter Robson & Jessica Silbey (eds.), Law and Justice on the Small Screen. Hart Publishing. pp. 289-307 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dateline NBC’s “To Catch a Predator”(2006-08) involved NBC staff working with police and a watchdog group called “Perverted Justice” to televise “special intensity” arrests of men who were lured into meeting adult decoys posing as young children, presumably for a sexual encounter. As reality television, “To Catch a Predator” facilitates public shaming of those caught in front of the cameras, which distinguishes it from fictional representations. In one case, a Texas District Attorney, Louis Conradt, shot himself on film, unable to bear the public humiliation of cameras airing his arrest. The show engenders conflicting responses: Did the show fulfill a public service by informing the public about real dangers and deterring potential predators, or was it an insensitive effort to garner ratings by taking advantage of human weaknesses? Is the sort of public shaming it imposes an appropriate form of punishment given the legitimate purposes of punishment? Did the show portray justice, or did it entrap victims? How did NBC’s working relationship with local police bear on the answer to that question? This paper addresses these questions and develops three objections to the show: that NBC in effect metes out unjust punishment; that it invades privacy; and that it entraps.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legitimate Expectations in Theory, Practice, and Punishment.Matt Matravers - 2017 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 4 (2):307-323.
Non‐paradigmatic punishments.Helen Brown Coverdale & Bill Wringe - 2022 - Philosophy Compass 17 (5):e12824.
Regulating Police Use of Deadly Force.Roger Wertheimer - 1982 - In N. Bowie & F. Elliston (eds.), Ethics, Public Policy and Criminal Justice. Oelgeschalger, Gunn & Hain. pp. 93--109.
Privacy and Punishment.Mark Tunick - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (4):643-668.
Why People Obey the Law.Tom R. Tyler - 2006 - Princeton University Press.
Punishment and Public Reason: Reply to Hoskins.Chad Flanders - 2023 - Criminal Justice Ethics 42 (1):38-51.
Public Reason and the Justification of Punishment.Zachary Hoskins - 2022 - Criminal Justice Ethics 41 (2):121-141.
Public Shaming as Moral Self-Defence.James Edgar Lim - forthcoming - Social Theory and Practice.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-07

Downloads
672 (#38,615)

6 months
85 (#73,238)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Tunick
Florida Atlantic University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two concepts of rules.John Rawls - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (1):3-32.
Entrapment and Retributive Theory.Mark Tunick - 2011 - In Mark D. White (ed.), Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy. Oxford University Press.

Add more references