Masked Abilities and Manipulation Arguments

Abstract

Dispositional accounts of free will provide a promising avenue for compatibilists about free will and determinism to respond to manipulation arguments, but requires an adequate account of masked and finkish abilities. In this thesis, I argue that an account of masked dispositions that addresses the context sensitivity, gradability, and dispositional quality of masks can allow dispositional compatibilists to level viable responses to various manipulation arguments. I address my response towards both Pereboom’s and Mele’s manipulation arguments.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-01

Downloads
29 (#779,834)

6 months
7 (#724,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gus Turyn
Cornell University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references