Progress and degeneration in the 'IQ debate' (I)

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):99-135 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Progress and Degeneration in the ‘Iq Debate’: Comments on Urbach.Jack Tizard - 1976 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (3):251-258.
Progress and degeneration in the 'IQ debate' (II).Peter Urbach - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):235-259.
Review of Peter Urbach and Colin Howson: Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach[REVIEW]Barry Gower - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):126-131.
Review. Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach. Colin Howson, Peter Urbach.Barry Gower - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):126-131.
Review: Francis Bacon. Novum Organum (tr. and ed. by Peter Urbach and John Gibson). [REVIEW]J. R. Milton - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):125-128.
On Urbach's analysis of the ‘iq debate’.Michael A. B. Deakin - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (1):60-65.
On Urbach's analysis of the 'iq debate'.Michael A. B. Deakin - 1976 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (1):60-65.
On Urbach's analysis of the ‘iq debate’.Michael A. B. Deakin - 1976 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (1):60-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
171 (#138,474)

6 months
25 (#126,508)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Urbach
London School of Economics

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references