El criterio del azar vs. la ponderación en la asignación de recursos sanitarios escasos ante emergencias sanitarias

Persona y Bioética 25 (1):2512-2512 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When events such as a pandemic occur, and the entire population’s health must be ensured, the focus is on public health. Despite several criteria for decision-making, it is advisable to delve into the weighting beyond the mere consideration of plainly visible factors. We propose weighting as a mechanism instead of chance since, given the person’s substantial unity and intrinsic dignity, their destiny cannot be subject to anything less than the exercise of intelligible judgment inherent to human reason.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Del derecho a la salud a la ética del racionamiento sanitario.Ángel Puyol - 2017 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 52:43-65.
Tópicos de salud oral en las asignaturas de las carreras de ciencias de la salud. La parte faltante del cuerpo.Gonzalo Bravo, Sofía Salgado & Roger Yefi - 2023 - Human Review. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades 12 (Monográfico):1-11.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-10

Downloads
19 (#1,063,060)

6 months
9 (#451,423)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references