The undecidability of entailment and relevant implication

Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1059-1073 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Undecidability Result in the Theory of Relevant Implication.Robert K. Meyer - 1968 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 14 (13‐17):255-262.
An Undecidability Result in the Theory of Relevant Implication.Robert K. Meyer - 1968 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 14 (13-17):255-262.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
61 (#349,239)

6 months
4 (#1,247,585)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alasdair Urquhart
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

Assertion, denial and non-classical theories.Greg Restall - 2012 - In Francesco Berto, Edwin Mares, Koji Tanaka & Francesco Paoli (eds.), Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer. pp. 81--99.
Relevant implication and the case for a weaker logic.Ross T. Brady - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (2):151 - 183.
What is relevance logic?Arnon Avron - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (1):26-48.

View all 55 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The semantics of entailment — III.Richard Routley & Robert K. Meyer - 1972 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (2):192 - 208.
Models for entailment.Kit Fine - 1974 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 3 (4):347 - 372.
Career induction stops here (and here = 2).Robert K. Meyer - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):361 - 371.
An undecidable relevant logic.Robert K. Meyer & Richard Routley - 1973 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 19 (26‐29):389-397.

Add more references