Roles of Large Cardinals in Set Theory

Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 39 (2):83-92 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Critique of Hiroshi Kaneko, Dummett ni Tadoritsuku made: Hanjitsuzairon toha Nani ka.Takeshi Yamada - 2016 - Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 43 (1-2):37-48.
Set Theory: An Introduction to Large Cardinals.F. R. Drake & T. J. Jech - 1976 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (2):187-191.
Pantachies and Weakly Inaccessible Cardinals.Koji Nakatogawa - 1987 - Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 7 (2):57-71.
On ^|^alefsym;0-Complete Cardinals and ^|^Pi;11-Class of Ordinals.Kanji Namba - 1967 - Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 3 (2):77-86.
The Set-theoretic Multiverse : A Natural Context for Set Theory.Joel David Hamkins - 2011 - Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 19:37-55.
Set Theory and Lesniewski's Ontology.Masanao Ozawa & Toshiharu Waragai - 1985 - Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 6 (5):261-272.
The Future of Modern Set Theory.James E. Baumgartner - 1994 - Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 8 (4):187-190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-13

Downloads
14 (#1,273,358)

6 months
5 (#1,035,700)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references