The dispositional architecture of epistemic reasons

Philosophical Studies 176 (7):1887-1904 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Epistemic reasons are meant to provide justification for beliefs. In this paper, I will be concerned with the requirements that have to be met if reasons are to discharge this function. It is widely recognized, however, that only possessed reasons can justify beliefs and actions. But what are the conditions that have to be satisfied in order for one to possess reasons? I shall begin by motivating a particular condition, namely, the ‘treating’ requirement that has been deemed to be necessary for possessing reasons. In Sect. 1, I explain and criticize some of the existing accounts of the treating requirement for reason-possession. In Sect. 2, I will suggest a dispositional account of reason-possession in which the treating condition features prominently. Section 3 will deal with the some of the consequences of this account for such issues as the structure of epistemic defeat, the immediacy of perceptual justification and logical knowledge.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-25

Downloads
85 (#245,544)

6 months
8 (#569,389)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hamid Vahid
Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences

Citations of this work

The noetic effects of sin: a dispositional framework.Hamid Vahid - 2019 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 86 (3):199-211.
Reason, reasoning, and the taking condition.Hamid Vahid - forthcoming - European Journal of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and its limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.
Skepticism and the Veil of Perception.Michael Huemer - 2001 - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):105-116.
The skeptic and the dogmatist.James Pryor - 2000 - Noûs 34 (4):517–549.

View all 36 references / Add more references