Is Our Universe a Mere Fluke? The Cosmological Argument and Spinning the Universes

PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:75-82 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent discussions about the anthropic principle and the argument from design can perhaps be summarized as follows : The world is very unusual, so it must have been made by an intelligent creator. The world is very unusual, but unusual things do occur by chance. Both and , in their ordinary interpretations, have been labelled probabilistic fallacies. In my paper I will discuss in particular the following two aspects: The contemporary relevance of Cicero's discussions on chance. The fact that any talk of chance events is only possible subject to the more encompassing idea of "limited belief in chance"

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,169

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Reality of Chance.John M. Vickers - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:563 - 578.
The limited belief in chance.J. Van Brakel - 1991 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 22 (3):499-513.
Genealogical Explanations of Chance and Morals.Toby Handfield - 2016 - In Uri D. Leibowitz & Neil Sinclair (eds.), Explanation in Ethics and Mathematics: Debunking and Dispensability. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK.
Did the Universe Have a Chance?C. D. McCoy - 2019 - Philosophy of Science 86 (5):1262-1272.
The Universe Had One Chance.Heather Demarest - 2016 - Philosophy of Science 83 (2):248-264.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
89 (#242,974)

6 months
2 (#1,302,720)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The limited belief in chance.J. Van Brakel - 1991 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 22 (3):499-513.

Add more citations

References found in this work

God and Probability.D. H. Mellor - 1969 - Religious Studies 5 (2):223 - 234.
God of Chance.D. J. Bartholomew - 1985 - Religious Studies 21 (4):622-624.

Add more references