The linguistic basis for propositions

In Chris Tillman & Adam Murray, The Routledge Handbook of Propositions. Routledge. pp. 57-78 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Propositions are traditionally regarded as performing vital roles in theories of natural language, logic, and cognition. This chapter offers an opinionated survey of recent literature to assess whether they are still needed to perform three linguistic roles: be the meaning of a declarative sentence in a context, be what is designated by certain linguistic expressions, and be the content of illocutionary acts. After considering many of the relevant choice-points, I suggest that there remains a linguistic basis for propositions, but not for some of the traditional reasons.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-22

Downloads
1,171 (#17,126)

6 months
187 (#19,771)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter van Elswyk
Northwestern University

Citations of this work

Abstract Objects.David Liggins - 2024 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Propositions.Matthew McGrath - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
That solution to Prior’s puzzle.Hüseyin Güngör - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (9):2765-2785.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references