The Paradox of Our Desire for Children

Ethical Perspectives 2 (2):55-62 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Today the problem of responsible parenthood is frequently reduced to the question of whether or not a couple actually desires to have a child. In medical circles the same question is reduced even further to a choice between the various forms of medical assistance available to a couple who might desire to have a child, but who have been unsuccessful in their own efforts. As a counterbalance to this narrowing process, it would seem appropriate to ask a number of questions which in fact ought to precede it: Why do we want children in the first place? What are we really looking for in our desire to have children? What does it actually mean to have children?In attempting to answer these questions, our course will be a philosophical one, focusing on the meaning of our actions and the reality which surrounds us. Philosophy is unlikely to uncover new facts in such an investigation; its task is simply to examine the presuppositions present prior to our interpretation of the data that emerge from this. Our answers to the questions surrounding our desire for children and the meaning of parenthood must come prior to the available facts on the matter for the simple reason that it will define the significance that these facts will have for us.The questions frequently raised in ethical, pedagogical and juridical literature concerning the rights of parents and children with respect to one another must also precede our examination of the facts. Rights and obligations always pertain to a specific relationship. Knowledge of such relationships is presumed, therefore, when we go about discussing the rights and obligations of the parties involved. By exploring the presuppositions which make our questioning and understanding of the facts possible, philosophy endeavours to create a space wherein we can look at things differently, a space where new and different possibilities are opened up. While we admit that philosophy is not going to uncover new facts, it will, if it works, produce new possibilities for understanding the facts and give them meaning.In this paper, I would like to begin by offering a description of the love parents feel for their children. In the second section I will attempt to draw some conclusions from this description concerning our desire to have the children we do not yet have. In the final section I will endeavour to situate these conclusions in a somewhat broader context

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are Our Children Still Welcome?Bert Roebben - 1995 - Ethical Perspectives 2 (2):63-70.
Preferring a Genetically-Related Child.Tina Rulli - 2016 - New Content is Available for Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (6):669-698.
Genetic Choice, Disability, and Regret.Eileen Alexa Palmer - 1997 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Questions of Choice.J. Gingell & E. P. Brandon - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 34 (3):415-442.
Philosophy for Children: Why do we need it?Judy Satterwhite - 1982 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 3 (1).
Choice and circumstance.Claudia Mills - 1998 - Ethics 109 (1):154-165.
Gestationalism and the Rights of Adolescent Mothers.Teresa Baron - 2020 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 7 (2):239-254.
Stepparenting and Moral Parenthood.Luara Ferracioli - forthcoming - Journal of Social Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
24 (#914,270)

6 months
8 (#597,840)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Van Tongeren
Radboud University Nijmegen

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references