Justice and the Economics of Terminal Illness

Hastings Center Report 18 (4):34-40 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Our society is increasingly confronting the questions of whether health care can and should be limited on economic considerations. While it is tempting to use utilitarian‐based, cost‐benefit analysis in such decisions, only principles of procedural and substantive justice can provide solid moral grounds for using economic criteria to set limits on care. An ethic of justice can inform the development of guidelines for health planners in policies to limit care for the terminally ill and the nonterminal elderly.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
35 (#653,582)

6 months
12 (#312,930)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Autonomy and the Common Weal.Marion Danis & Larry R. Churchill - 1991 - Hastings Center Report 21 (1):25-31.
In defence of ageism.A. B. Shaw - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (3):188-194.
Healthcare Priorities: The “Young” and the “Old”.Ben Davies - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (2):174-185.
Medical Futility.Steven H. Miles - 1992 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 20 (4):310-315.
Futility: Is Definition the Problem? Part I.Miriam Piven Cotler & Dorothy Rasinski Gregory - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (2):219.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references