Two Logics: The Conflict Between Classical and Neo-Analytic Philosophy

Evanston, IL, USA: BoD – Books on Demand (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book is a consideration of the differences between Aristotelian and symbolic logic (and the metaphysical assumptions they come packaged with) and the consequences these have for how we view the world. What Veatch propose is to try to exhibit with respect to several of the key logical tools and devices – propositions, inductive and deductive arguments, scientific and historical explanations, definitions, etc. – how these several instruments are differently conceived, both as to their natures and their functions, in each of these respective logics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two Logics: The Conflict Between Classical and Neo-Analytic Philosophy.Robert G. Meyers - 1970 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 31 (1):136-136.
Two logics.Henry Babcock Veatch - 1969 - Evanston,: Northwestern University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-22

Downloads
12 (#1,381,944)

6 months
5 (#1,080,408)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references