Burge on Representation and Biological Function

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):125-133 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Origins of Objectivity, Burge presents three arguments against what he calls ‘deflationism’: the project of explaining the representational function in terms of the notion of biological function. I evaluate these arguments and argue that they are not convincing

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The Function of Perception.Peter J. Graham - 2014 - In Abrol Fairweather (ed.), Virtue Scientia: Bridges between Virtue Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Synthese Library. pp. 13-31.
Does Representational Content Arise from Biological Function?Richard J. Hall - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:193 - 199.
Origins of Objectivity.Tyler Burge - 2010 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Perception, Representation, Realism, and Function.Alison Ann Springle - 2019 - Philosophy of Science 86 (5):1202-1213.
Function, homology and character individuation.Paul E. Griffiths - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (1):1-25.
Four notions of biological function.Arno G. Wouters - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (4):633-668.
Function and causal relevance of content.Marcin Miłkowski - 2016 - New Ideas in Psychology 40 (94-102).

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-18

Downloads
1,006 (#20,868)

6 months
108 (#55,150)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Agustin Vicente
University of the Basque Country

References found in this work

Mind-body causation and explanatory practice.Tyler Burge - 1995 - In Pascal Engel (ed.), Mental causation. Oxford University Press.

Add more references