St. Anselm's ontological argument succumbs to Russell's paradox

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (3):123-128 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,169

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anselm and Russell.Maciej Nowicki - 2006 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 15 (4):355-368.
The ontological argument and Russell's antinomy.Sara L. Uckelman - 2009 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 18 (3-4):309-312.
St. Anselm's Ontological Argument.Chryssi Sidiropoulou - 2009 - Philosophical Inquiry 31 (3-4):131-152.
St. Anselm's Ontological Argument.Chryssi Sidiropoulou - 2009 - Philosophical Inquiry 31 (3-4):131-152.
"Exists" and St. Anselm's Argument.Philip E. Devine - 1977 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 3 (1):59-70.
Understanding Anselm's Ontological Argument.Guy Jackson - 2023 - Springer Nature Switzerland.
A Careful Reading of St. Anselm’s Ontological Argument.Clint I. Barrett - 2011 - Philosophy and Theology 23 (2):217-230.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
137 (#170,926)

6 months
13 (#259,115)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Viger
University of Western Ontario

References found in this work

On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.

Add more references