La máquina literaria de Maurice Blanchot

Universitas Philosophica 37 (74):197-230 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Unlike many dominant images of thought that are centered on searching for foundations whose coherence is found in binary logics or biunivocal relations, Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari’s philosophy constitutes a way of thinking through machines that produce pure multiplicities by virtue of intensive differences. What is important with regards to machines is to refrain from any attempt at defining or understanding them—they cannot be delimited and are a-signifying—and to try to make them work, such that various flows of thought may circulate through them, intermingling with and interrupting each other. Even though any machine groups together many heterogeneous elements, literary machines are interesting insofar as they can reach a level of the fragmentary whereby the determinant potency of intensive differences can be expressed. This article experiments with Maurice Blanchot’s literary machine—especially with his idea of the neuter—to discover operations that could help to dismantle the foundations of dominant images of thought.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Maurice Blanchot: The Fragment and the Whole.Lycette Nelson - 1992 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
How to Treat Machines that Might Have Minds.Nicholas Agar - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 33 (2):269-282.
Not This, Not That: Maurice Blanchot and Poststructualism.Rustam Singh - 2016 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 8 (1):72-82.
A Green Blanchot: Impossible?Timothy Clark - 2007 - Paragraph 30 (3):121-140.
Can machines think?W. Mays - 1952 - Philosophy 27 (April):148-62.
Deleuze & Guattari’s Intensive & Pragmatic Semiotic of Emergent Law.Jamie Murray - 2007 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 20 (1):7-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-11

Downloads
16 (#1,292,631)

6 months
4 (#1,001,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Proust y los signos.Gilles Deleuze - 1971 - Ideas Y Valores 38 (38):3.
R/m, 1953.Christophe Bident - 2007 - Paragraph 30 (3):67-83.

Add more references