Postscript to the third man: A reply to mr. Geach

Philosophical Review 65 (1):83-94 (1956)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2182190

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Vlastos and "the third man".Wilfrid Sellars - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (3):405-437.
Exegesis and Argument Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos. [REVIEW]Fred D. Miller - 1976 - Philosophical Review 85 (1):128-132.
Addenda to the third man argument: A reply to professor Sellars.Gregory Vlastos - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (3):438-448.
A reply to mr. Taylor.Frederick A. Olafson - 1959 - Philosophical Review 68 (3):373-379.
Reply to mr. Nelson.Manley Thompson - 1954 - Philosophical Review 63 (3):414-419.
A Reply to Mr. Sellars.P. F. Strawson - 1954 - Philosophical Review 63 (2):216-231.
Hume on "is" and "ought": A reply to mr. Macintyre.R. F. Atkinson - 1961 - Philosophical Review 70 (2):231-238.
The man of power: A reply to professor Rogers.Warner Fite - 1913 - Philosophical Review 22 (1):38-52.
The third man again.P. T. Geach - 1956 - Philosophical Review 65 (1):72-82.
Geach on entailment.A. J. Dale - 1973 - Philosophical Review 82 (2):215-219.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
93 (#221,716)

6 months
12 (#269,036)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Abstract objects.Gideon Rosen - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references