Contracts: Sixth Circuit interprets COB clause to hold ERISA insurer liable

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (4):321 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Michigan Court Clarifies Liability for COB Provisions in ERISA and Auto Plans.C. S. - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (1):72-72.
Contracts: state extension-of-benefits law not preempted by ERISA.A. Rathburn - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (1):72-73.
Employment: Sixth Circuit affirms spousal notification of COBRA rights.A. Falk - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (4):322-322.
Disability & ADA: Sixth Circuit affirms congressional intent of Title III.N. M. Bilitz - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (4):314-316.
ERISA: state preferred provider statute preempted by ERISA.L. Steiner - 1998 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (3):251.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-31

Downloads
9 (#1,550,812)

6 months
3 (#1,498,028)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references