Deserved criminal sentences: an overview

Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Introduction: the emergence of the proportionate sentence -- Sentence proportionality sketched briefly -- Why should the criminal sanction exist? -- Why punish proportionately? -- Ordinal and cardinal proportionality -- Seriousness, severity and the living-standard -- The role of previous convictions -- Proportionate non-custodial sanctions -- A "modified" desert model? -- The politics of the desert model -- Proportionate sentences for juveniles -- Appendix: the desert model's evolution : a brief chronology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-09

Downloads
19 (#1,079,394)

6 months
5 (#1,050,400)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Social Injustice of Parental Imprisonment.Lars Lindblom & William Bülow - 2020 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 7 (2):299-320.
Consequentialist Theories of Punishment.Hsin-Wen Lee - 2022 - In Matthew C. Altman (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook on the Philosophy of Punishment. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 149-169.
Retributivism and the (Lack of) Justification of Proportionality.Jesper Ryberg - 2021 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 15 (3):447-462.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references